|
CONTACT:
|
Helen Mickiewicz - 415-703-1319
|
|
November 28, 2000
|
| |
Mary Jo Borak - 415-703-1879
|
|
CPUC - 545
|
CPUC REPORTS
FOUR MILLION PHONE NUMBERS
REMAIN IN EACH
415, 510, 818
AND 909 AREA CODES
The California Public Utilities Commission's
(CPUC) Telecommunications Division reported today that
approximately half of the total telephone numbers remain unused in
the 415, 510, 818 and 909 area codes in California. The four
reports, part of a massive CPUC analysis of phone number use in
all California area codes, show that each of these area codes has
considerable room for growth, resulting in no need for these area
codes to be split or overlaid. An overlay is where two area codes
serve the same area.
Each area code contains almost eight million
numbers. The studies found that between 3.9 million and 4.3
million phone numbers remain unused in each of the four area
codes, as shown below:
|
|
415
|
510
|
818
|
909
|
|
Set Aside by CPUC for pooling and
lottery
|
1.0 million
|
1.5 million
|
1.2 million
|
850,000
|
|
Wireline Companies /1
|
2.1 million
|
1.9 million
|
1.8 million
|
2.2 million
|
|
Wireless Companies
|
700,000
|
864,000
|
834,000
|
830,000
|
|
Total Unused Numbers /2
|
3.9 million
|
4.3 million
|
3.9 million
|
3.9 million
|
/1 "Wireline" refers to
companies that use a land-based telephone network, such as Pacific
Bell, or competitive local telephone companies.
/2 Numbers may not add up due to
rounding.
The CPUC has acted to stem the proliferation
of new area codes in California through aggressive conservation
measures instituted this year. Those measures include assigning
numbers to companies in blocks of 1,000 instead of the traditional
10,000 (known as "number pooling"), and establishing
rules that require companies to use the numbers they already have
more efficiently. Of the total unused numbers in each area code,
the phone numbers set aside by the CPUC for number pooling can be
allocated today to local phone companies needing new numbers to
serve their customers.
The number conservation benefits from
pooling have been dramatic. The pool has satisfied the phone
number needs of all companies participating in the pool without
needing to use any new prefixes.
The Telecommunications Division's reports
recommend several further actions the CPUC, Federal Communications
Commission (FCC), and telephone companies could take to use
numbers more efficiently. Currently, companies donate to the
number pool only those "blocks" of 1,000 numbers that
have fewer than ten percent of numbers in use. Existing FCC rules
also allow wireless companies to voluntarily join wireline
companies in participating in the number pool (until November 2002
when participation becomes mandatory). The reports suggest that
California number pooling efforts would be even more effective if
1) companies were required to donate "blocks" of 1,000
numbers that are more than ten percent used, and 2) wireless
carriers were required to participate now in number pooling rather
than receive numbers through a lottery.
The reports reiterate the CPUC's request
that the FCC allow California to implement technology-specific
overlays. That option could ensure that consumers' existing
numbers are left intact, while meeting the demands of companies
offering wireless and other technologies that represent the
fastest-growing demand on California's numbering resources.
The reports also found that numerous
telecommunications companies have failed to submit their number
use data and recommend that those carriers be refused additional
numbers and be assessed penalties for noncompliance.
As the report concludes, a key factor
driving the need for new area codes is the traditional inefficient
number allocation methods used across the nation. Historically,
when a telephone company needed telephone numbers to serve its
customers, it had to obtain a whole prefix containing 10,000
telephone numbers, regardless of how many numbers the company
actually needed.
Today, more than 200 local phone companies
operate in California. This increased competition and increased
use of pagers, faxes, cellular phones and other technologies
creates an artificial demand for telephone numbers, which in turn
fuels the demand to add new area codes. Creating new area codes
imposes significant costs and burdens on consumers whose numbers
are changed because letterhead and business materials must be
reprinted and the new numbers must be reprogrammed into all
equipment.
The four reports issued today follow the
CPUC Telecommunications Division's first area code report issued
for the 310 area code last March. The Division expects to complete
its analysis of all California area codes next year.
The 415, 510, 818 and 909 number utilization
reports will be posted on the PUC website today at www.cpuc.ca.gov.
More information about the
four area codes follows:
The 415 Area Code
One of the first three area codes created in
California in 1947, the 415 area code originally covered all of
central California. Today, the 415 area code encompasses only San
Francisco and portions of Marin County. The area originally
covered by the 415 area code now includes areas covered by the
209, 408, 510, 559, 650 831, and 925.
In response to the notice by the North
American Numbering Plan Administrator (NANPA) - which monitors
area code growth nationwide - to the CPUC that the 415 was running
out of numbers, the CPUC approved an area code overlay for 415 in
April, 1999. The new area code overlay was scheduled to be
implemented in October 2000. However, in response to overwhelming
consumer concern about area code proliferation, the CPUC suspended
all previously approved overlays, including the 415, in December
1999.
The CPUC began number pooling in 415 on July
29, 2000. Prior to pooling, 190,000 new numbers would have been
needed to satisfy demand. With pooling, demand for numbers in the
pool has been only 20 percent of what was expected.
The 510 Area Code
The 510 area code was formed in 1991,
splitting off the East Bay, Alameda, and Contra Costa Counties
from the 415 area code which at that time covered most of the San
Francisco Bay Area. In 1998, Contra Costa and Eastern Alameda
Counties were split off from the 510 area code, forming the 925
area code.
Despite introduction of the 510 area code in
1998 to add numbers for customers in the East Bay, NANPA
determined in the spring of 1998 that the 510 area code was
running short of numbers. In response, the CPUC approved an area
code overlay in April 1999. In December 1999, the CPUC suspended
all overlays previously approved, including the overlay of the 510
area code scheduled to take effect in June, 1999.
The 818 Area Code
The 818 area code was split from the 213
area code in 1984. Then in June 1997, the 818 area code itself was
split with creation of the 626 area code. The current 818 area
code serves the San Fernando Valley in Southern California, while
the 626 serves the San Gabriel Valley.
Despite the introduction of another area
code in 1997 to provide more numbers for customers in the 818 area
code, NANPA decided in early 1998 that the 818 area code needed
still more numbers. In October 1999, the CPUC ordered
implementation of a variety of measures to conserve numbers in the
818 area code. In
the same decision, the CPUC adopted a geographic split as a
back-up area code plan. At the same time, the CPUC deferred an
implementation date until and unless it could be determined that
number conservation measures have failed to provide enough numbers
to facilitate competition in the 818 area code.
The 909 Area Code
The 909 area code, which covers communities
in Riverside, San Bernardino, and Los Angeles Counties, was
created in 1992 when it was split from the 714 area code.
Despite the fact that the 909 area code is
only eight years old, NANPA determined in early 1998 that the 909
area code was running short of numbers and needed another area
code. In response, in March, 1999, the PUC approved a two-phase
change: a geographic split and subsequent overlay. The split was
scheduled to be implemented in December 2000, while the overlay
was scheduled for February 2001. However, responding to consumer
concern about the 310 overlay, in December 1999, the CPUC
suspended all new area code plans, including the scheduled 909
split and subsequent overlay. |